<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Azure and Google Chrome: the Future of Cloud Computing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gadgetcrave.com/windows-azure-and-google-chrome-the-future-of-the-cloud/1039/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gadgetcrave.com/windows-azure-and-google-chrome-the-future-of-the-cloud/1039/</link>
	<description>The Coolest Gadgets &#38; Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:14:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: thethinktank</title>
		<link>http://gadgetcrave.com/windows-azure-and-google-chrome-the-future-of-the-cloud/1039/comment-page-1/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>thethinktank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 06:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadgetcrave.com/?p=1039#comment-132</guid>
		<description>Perhaps it wasn&#039;t explained quite clearly: 
&quot;Like Google&#8217;s Chrome OS and its potential in cloud computing, Windows Azure could run off a light OS, basically an extension of Internet Explorer using web-based apps for common desktop software.&quot; 
 
The supposition here is that Microsoft would, as they&#039;ve historically operated, provide a client OS required for their Azure system.  The client OS operating on Azure would compete with Chrome, and I have a hard time seeing Microsoft offering anything remotely similar to an open environment.  While I explained it quite clumsily above, the suggestion is that Microsoft will try to compete with Chrome OS for the client OS operating on its&#039; cloud.  So you have Windows Azure,  but does anyone NOT expect them to provide/suggest/require some sort of OS for users?  This is why Chrome might compete directly with Microsoft&#039;s plans for cloud computing in the future, albeit that each company is taking separate approaches. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps it wasn&#039;t explained quite clearly:<br />
&quot;Like Google&rsquo;s Chrome OS and its potential in cloud computing, Windows Azure could run off a light OS, basically an extension of Internet Explorer using web-based apps for common desktop software.&quot; </p>
<p>The supposition here is that Microsoft would, as they&#039;ve historically operated, provide a client OS required for their Azure system.  The client OS operating on Azure would compete with Chrome, and I have a hard time seeing Microsoft offering anything remotely similar to an open environment.  While I explained it quite clumsily above, the suggestion is that Microsoft will try to compete with Chrome OS for the client OS operating on its&#039; cloud.  So you have Windows Azure,  but does anyone NOT expect them to provide/suggest/require some sort of OS for users?  This is why Chrome might compete directly with Microsoft&#039;s plans for cloud computing in the future, albeit that each company is taking separate approaches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lbaltimore</title>
		<link>http://gadgetcrave.com/windows-azure-and-google-chrome-the-future-of-the-cloud/1039/comment-page-1/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>lbaltimore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 04:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadgetcrave.com/?p=1039#comment-131</guid>
		<description>Poor article. Windows Azure and Google Chrome OS don&#039;t compete against each other at all, and any attempt at saying they do so is a massive stretch - applications running on the Azure service can run in Google Chrome OS, and Microsoft&#039;s push towards the web will only drive adoption of web applications and make Google&#039;s suite look more legitimate as they now compete on equal footing. 
 
A valid, direct comparison would be Windows Azure versus Google App Engine. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor article. Windows Azure and Google Chrome OS don&#039;t compete against each other at all, and any attempt at saying they do so is a massive stretch &#8211; applications running on the Azure service can run in Google Chrome OS, and Microsoft&#039;s push towards the web will only drive adoption of web applications and make Google&#039;s suite look more legitimate as they now compete on equal footing. </p>
<p>A valid, direct comparison would be Windows Azure versus Google App Engine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ign</title>
		<link>http://gadgetcrave.com/windows-azure-and-google-chrome-the-future-of-the-cloud/1039/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>ign</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadgetcrave.com/?p=1039#comment-127</guid>
		<description>How can you even compare the two? Azure apps will run just fine on Google Chrome (or IE or Firefox or Safari). You do realize that Azure is a strictly Microsoft hosted server and Google Chrome OS is a client software? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can you even compare the two? Azure apps will run just fine on Google Chrome (or IE or Firefox or Safari). You do realize that Azure is a strictly Microsoft hosted server and Google Chrome OS is a client software?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/17 queries in 0.018 seconds using apc
Content Delivery Network via gadgetcrave.frsucrave.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: gadgetcrave.com @ 2012-02-09 09:30:28 -->
